Members

Andy Richardson


Back to homepage

PPR: Has it caught on too much?

Posted Jul. 27 at 06:05 AM

An experts league I've been in for the past several years is switching to a point-per-reception (PPR) scoring system, where pass catchers are awarded an extra fantasy point for every reception. That officially makes 7 leagues I'm in that are PPR, and zero that aren't. I voted against it, but I was one of only two owners to do so.

It's not that I'm totally against PPR, or at least I never have been. In fact, I switched my own league to PPR two years back. A decision, I might add, that I'm now hoping to reverse this season, if I can get the votes.

I understand the arguments for it. Giving wide receivers more value compared to running backs is No. 1, while deepening the pool of startable running backs is a close second. Without PPR, the first 15 or so picks are almost entirely running backs, and talented pass-catching backs like Kevin Faulk and Leon Washington have minimal value. With it, you can easily load up on wide receivers early and draft third-down running backs late, plus you can sometimes draft top tailbacks like Michael Turner (who don't catch any passes) with late-first or early second-round picks.

And that's OK. It's particularly important in larger, 14- or 16-team leagues (they do exist) where without PPR it's difficult to field two decent running backs, and up to half the teams won't be able to.

But is the non-PPR format going to go the way of the dinosaur? Is it really a good thing when a statistical argument can be made for selecting a guy like Wes Welker ahead of Frank Gore and Michael Turner? Or taking Reggie Bush among the top dozen running backs when he's arguably the second-best back on his own team?

Personally, I've soured on the format in 10-team leagues, and I'm not too crazy about using it in 12-team leagues, either. I think it's resulted, ironically, in an undervaluing of true franchise running backs -- the players who have always been the lifeblood of fantasy football -- while overvaluing scatbacks and slot receivers.

In short, PPR is fine, maybe even necessary, for some leagues. But for all of them?

So I'm going to put it to a vote in my league. To keep or not to keep. I don't know that I'll get the votes, but I can hope.

Readers' Comments

Posted by Travis Billman | Jul. 27 at 10:30 AM

One option for those who really want to stay with PPR is to moderate it with 1/2 point per reception. It increases their value, but doesn't push them over the elite backs. I'm in two leagues like this and it gives a subtle twist.

Posted by ANDY RICHARDSON | Jul. 27 at 11:33 AM

My dynasty league gives running backs half a point, wide receivers one point, and tight ends a point and a half per reception. It's an interesting way to do it, giving pass-catching running backs a slight edge over the ones who don't, wide receivers the same edge over them, and making tight ends more valuable.

Add a Comment

Already a registered user? Please sign in to add comments.

To add comments, you must become a registered user of our site. To register, please click here.

Fantasy Index Weekly

Order your Fantasy Baseball Index Cheat Sheet Update

Get our latest cheat sheets, including rankings for AL, NL and Combined Leagues using 5x5 and 4x4 scoring categories. Plus: Team-by-team analysis, stat projections, breaking news, depth charts, and printer-friendly PDF cheat sheets.

Buy Cheat Sheet Update | Log In


Past Articles

More

Toolbox