Some are fans of strength of schedule, and not just for wins and points. They like to see rushing and passing schedules as well, and those figures are published below.

On these charts, I used only the first 15 games for each team. Most fantasy leagues don’t use Week 17, so I left those games out. On the charts, I’m listing per-game numbers for yards; I think that’s more understandable and intuitive for people to read. But I’m using per-season numbers for touchdowns. I think most people have a better feel for what 27 TD passes in a season feels like, rather than 1.69 TD passes per game.

For rushing, the Bears, Broncos and Patriots project to play the easiest schedules. That’s using standard scoring and assuming defenses will play like they did last year. Washington, Tampa Bay and the Giants project to play the hardest schedules (for rushing).

STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE, RUSHING (G 1-15)
TeamYd/GTD/YrPts/G
Chicago11212.616.3
Denver11312.316.2
New England11112.816.2
Oakland11211.915.9
Arizona11311.615.9
Minnesota11112.115.9
Tennessee11511.015.9
LA Chargers10912.215.8
Cleveland11211.415.7
Carolina11111.615.7
Green Bay11011.815.7
NY Jets10812.015.6
Baltimore11011.615.6
San Francisco10911.815.6
Miami11210.915.6
Cincinnati10811.615.5
Kansas City11110.815.4
Jacksonville11010.915.4
Indianapolis11210.415.4
Buffalo11110.415.3
Pittsburgh11010.615.2
Seattle10811.015.2
New Orleans10810.915.1
Dallas10910.615.1
Detroit10710.815.0
Houston10910.315.0
LA Rams10511.114.9
Philadelphia1109.914.9
Atlanta10710.314.8
Tampa Bay1079.914.7
NY Giants1079.814.7
Washington1069.414.3

For passing, Jacksonville, Washington and Houston project to play the easiest schedules. And note that Chicago (No. 1 for rushing) is up there at 4th.) Kansas City, Green Bay and Oakland project to play the hardest schedules for passing. Again using standard scoring (6 points for TD passes and 1 point for every 10 yards).

STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE, PASSING (G 1-15)
TeamYd/GTD/YrPts/G
Jacksonville24823.434.2
Washington24524.134.1
Houston24223.433.6
Chicago24722.133.5
Atlanta24322.733.3
Minnesota24521.933.3
Philadelphia24122.833.2
Dallas24322.133.1
Indianapolis23922.933.0
Miami24321.633.0
NY Giants24022.232.9
Buffalo24121.832.8
Tampa Bay23922.132.8
Carolina24221.432.8
Denver24021.832.7
Cincinnati24021.632.6
LA Chargers24021.332.6
Seattle23821.832.5
Tennessee23722.132.5
New Orleans24021.332.5
NY Jets23921.332.4
Cleveland23821.432.3
San Francisco23921.032.3
Pittsburgh23821.132.2
New England23920.832.2
Baltimore23820.832.2
Arizona23620.932.0
LA Rams23620.932.0
Detroit23620.631.9
Oakland23221.331.7
Green Bay23519.631.4
Kansas City22920.931.3

I am not, by the way, much of a believer in trying to using specified strength of schedule. I don’t think it’s the secret edge to help you win fantasy football games. Look, for example, at teams that projected to play top-5 (easy) rushing schedules in the last four years. There was some correlation with these 20 teams; 40 percent of them (8 of 20) played top-6 rushing schedules. But almost half (9 of 20) actually played below-average schedules.

TOP-5 RUSHING SCHEDULES (last 4 years)
YearTeamYd/GTD/YrPt/GRnk
2014NY Jets1099.714.527
2014Minnesota10711.214.919
2014Indianapolis11511.615.910
2014Jacksonville11712.116.25
2014Houston11713.216.62
2015Houston10711.915.117
2015Carolina11112.915.95
2015Washington11511.916.04
2015Tampa Bay11212.716.03
2015Atlanta11412.316.02
2016Green Bay10512.715.229
2016Minnesota10412.815.228
2016Chicago10712.415.327
2016Detroit10513.215.526
2016Dallas10913.015.820
2017Carolina10812.115.323
2017LA Chargers11011.715.415
2017NY Jets11212.315.86
2017Tennessee11212.716.04
2017New England11113.316.13

It’s similar with passing. Look at the 20 teams projecting to play easy schedules in the last four years – top-5 schedules. Again, only a slight majority even played above-average schedules (12 of 20). Four played top-6 schedules, but four played bottom-10 schedules.

In general, when trying to build your team, I think your time is better spent elsewhere.

TOP-5 PASSING SCHEDULES (last 4 years)
YearTeamYd/GTD/YrPt/GRnk
2014Detroit25624.634.810
2014Seattle25524.134.513
2014Buffalo24725.334.216
2014Chicago25023.033.624
2014Miami24823.433.526
2015Atlanta26630.338.02
2015Tampa Bay26629.137.53
2015Carolina26428.437.16
2015NY Giants26227.736.612
2015New Orleans25626.535.518
2016NY Giants26126.135.92
2016Dallas25924.535.111
2016Cleveland26023.934.915
2016Baltimore25524.734.817
2016Cincinnati25024.734.327
2017Carolina24722.533.17
2017Chicago24422.932.910
2017New Orleans24222.332.617
2017Tampa Bay24022.932.620
2017Minnesota24122.332.523

—Ian Allan